Of course, we could also have other nouns after “no” than “effect.” “No affect” is wrong because “affect” is first and foremost, a verb.Īnd after “no” we need a noun for the sentence to make sense because “no” needs to be followed by a direct object.Īnd this is where effect comes into play because effect is first and firemost a noun and can indeed function as a direct object. So the proof for that claim is actually pretty simple. But when claiming something, we should also deliver some actual proof for that, right? In this article, we claim that “no affect” is indeed wrong. The logic behind “no effect ” and “no affect ”

While it is true that “affect” can be a noun in some (rare) cases, it is usually a verb and it is never used together with the determiner “no ” as in “ no affect. ” The determiner “no” needs to be followed by a noun. The correct answer to this question is always “ no effect.

So, in this article, we will have a closer look at this very problem and we will determine who’s the actual winner in this epic battle between “no effect vs. Well, not exactly because one of these two is actually wrong. Which one you should go for, obviously always depends on the context and the very meaning of the sentence.īut is that the same for “no effect vs. effect is a commonly discussed problem and people often still struggle to choose the right one between the two.

Have an effect on synonym